this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
391 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60351 readers
4364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Landmark legislation sees the Australian government committed to the novel step of child protection by banning social media for under sixteens.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huginn@feddit.it 17 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They've set it up so it's a legal mess. The platforms aren't given any mechanism to actually perform verifications (no double blind id system, for example) but are legally on the hook for each and every under-16 on the platforms. A quote in the article suggests it should be the app stores verifying which is even more fucking stupid.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Well, I know how that would go if I were a globe-spanning social media giant. Given that the entirety of the Australian market is roughly the size of New York state (~26 vs ~20 million people), I would say, "Nah mate, we just won't do business in Oz anymore. Bye."

Vanishingly few business make a "New York only" version of their product because it's simply not worth it. Australia already suffers under this problem for a great deal of physical products. Ask any computer nerd about that, when trying to source parts and often video game titles as well. Shipping things to the Antipodes and/or dealing with Antipodean regulations is expensive, for an objectively low number of potential sales.

It would not surprise me to learn if it follows that Australia generates roughly 1.7% of the revenue for Facebook or whoever as, say, India. So in other words, bupkis.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

A quote in the article suggests it should be the app stores verifying which is even more fucking stupid.

Why?

[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because the internet isn't an app store

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 12 points 6 hours ago

The quote says that app stores should be responsible for verifying age, but social media is not limited to apps - they're just one of multiple user interfaces for interacting with social networks. So that alone cannot solve the problem.

Sorry for the confusion

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 4 hours ago

Because how would you do that on desktop? Or on a degoogled phone? Or if the download was via an apk from elsewhere?

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Because the app store isn't the only way to install an app. It is trivially easy to side load apps and it's well within the technologic skillset of the average 12 year old.

They can also just use a web browser.