this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
718 points (94.3% liked)

Comic Strips

14620 readers
1856 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

“Probably not [thing]”.

That’s equivalent to “isn’t necessarily [thing]”.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No? First means less-than-50% probability of thing, second means less-than-100% probability of thing

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Ah this is a classic language misunderstanding. "Isn't necessarily" means "possibly not [thing]" or "doesn't have to be" or "may or may not be" but doesn't have much bearing on probabilities.

That's how people usually use that term in English anyway.

EDIT sorry didn't mean to dogpile. I just saw that a couple other people already replied.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

You explained it the best

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 5 points 2 months ago

You aren't necessarily good at modal statements.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

That's simply not true. I agree that it seems to be social anxiety depicted but you misunderstand that phrase. That's basically just saying it could be something else, nothing to do with likelihood.