this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
742 points (92.5% liked)

196

16757 readers
3339 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] big_fat_fluffy@leminal.space 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Plaigerism isn't the problem. This society that makes living so hard that you need to snatch every crumb, that's the problem.

Great artists have been stealing and sampling since forever. It really isn't a big deal unless you're broke.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think "plagiarism" refers to taking credit for the work of others. Using other people's work to make your own isn't "plagiarism" if you give credit. This doesn't mean AI is good, just that "plagiarism" isn't the correct word.

[–] YummyYugi@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How many songs credit every sample and loop?

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What I said was

[It] isn't "plagiarism" if you give credit.

This is different from saying "If you don't give credit, it's plagiarism."

Put another way: it is sufficient for something to not be plagiarism if all materials are credited, but that doesn't necessarily mean everything that doesn't do that is plagiarism per-se. It is beyond the scope of my musings to reckon the minimum requirement of non-accreditation for something to qualify as "plagiarism".