this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
792 points (98.8% liked)

memes

12825 readers
3032 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Does anybody really know what time it is?

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Only that one teacher who cared if you walked in one second late but would then keep the whole class after the bell because they think they're above not only all the kids but all the other teachers as well.

[–] thessnake03@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

If so, I can't imagine why

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, Atomic Clocks can measure time with great precision as the radioactive decay of elements is extremely consistent.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Some physicists think they do. I have heard two different ideas though both summarise to "time is a side effect of the universe operating

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The real caveat there may be: which time dimension:-).

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that current theory has only one time dimension and some number of space ones

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Oh yes, I'm going beyond that to "possibilities that are fascinating to consider, despite having no evidence whatsoever to support them":-).