this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
187 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39386 readers
2231 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

South Korea has officially entered the “super-aged” category, with 20% of its population (10.24 million people) now aged 65 or older, according to the interior ministry.

This marks a significant demographic shift, as the nation struggles with low birth rates and a rapidly aging population.

Regions like Jeolla Province report the highest elderly percentage (27.18%), while Sejong has the lowest (11.57%).

In response, the government plans to create a population strategy ministry to address the crisis with systematic measures and long-term solutions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

For those who don't, why is it obvious?

[–] jameseb@lemm.ee 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I assume because it is a relatively new city planned to replace Seoul as the capital city to reduce congestion. Its population would be mostly people from outside moving into the area, and elderly people tend to be more set in their ways and less willing to take risks like moving to a newly formed city.

[–] DurbanPoison@feddit.nl 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sejong_City

I got no clue man I'm high as fuck

Looks like they tried to make it the new Capital but they made a huge bunch of fuck-ups

I don't know the direct connection to birth rates. Not sure what happened but I tapped something on accident and can't read whatever most of the article says now.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

true to the username 😤 that's why we hired you

[–] DurbanPoison@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I need to know

Why was the penis inspection necessary

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

They know their judo well

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

It’s a new city

Constructed to move some of the working population out of Seoul, it hasn’t been around long enough to have a large retirement age population