this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
170 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
4742 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Advance opens door for secure quantum applications without specialized infrastructure

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The article starts by doing the "quantum" thing that really irks me, where they use confusing terminology to make it sound like "FTL communication" without actually saying it. This is garbage that doesn't actually matter to the article.

Basically, they found a way to send quantum entangled photons (which exist in a very delicate unobserved state) through existing fiber optic infrastructure without interfering with the standard internet information already travelling through the fiber. A lot of the difficulty with this is due to signal noise that needs to be filtered out. This will be useful communicating quantum measurements over long distances.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It should be a legal requirement to link the actual research paper at the top of science articles

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I've seen a lot of articles that were like "scientists do this!!" And never link to the actual study (not including this article)

What happened to citing your sources?

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

2nd paragraph wasn't good enough, huh?

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I didn’t say they didn’t link the paper.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Only limited by the speed of light..."

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They then go on to describe what sounds like

  • transmitting a single specific photon through ‘the internet’, implying start-to-finish with routing (not possible without special infrastructure)

  • Use that photon to then send information instantly by manipulating its entangled sibling (also not possible)

So yeah this article is a crock of shit.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The article did not describe either of those things that way. Cynicism is overriding reading comprehension.

The article starts by doing the "quantum" thing that really irks me

Basically, they found a way to send quantum entangled photons