this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
703 points (96.6% liked)

196

16736 readers
2375 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
703
framed rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

I'd sincerely recommend everyone to read his manifesto and think about it a little bit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Why would you think the feds want the wrong guy? Because what they want the actual killer to be roaming free.

What happens if the real killer does another hit in a few weeks? The Feds just be like erm nah this is a copycat we will get him too.

Occam's razor.

Also this post is filled with misinformation itself. There are plenty of 3D printed gun demos on YouTube where the guns don’t explode.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You don't seriously think that the feds are trying to keep America safe, do you? The feds and NYPD all need to have someone in jail so they can claim that they did a good job. They want to brag about how accomplished they are.

There is no duty to protect and serve. The police do not have to protect you, and they don't on a regular basis. I know you might have heard that growing up, but it's just not true.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

If the "real" shooter hits again, that illusion SHATTERS. It's a terrible play.

[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Also as far as I'm aware it wasn't a fully 3d printed gun, rather a 3d printed lower for a Glock. The lower doesn't have to handle anywhere near the levels of pressure that the upper does, so is unlikely to break when firing.