this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1105 points (99.2% liked)
Funny
6982 readers
391 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're right, but "every second" was meant more as a display of the energy in the train, like a large explosion "every second". Is that very wrong?
Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand...
A large explosion every second has units of power, not energy. So to me this is suggesting that the train is putting out power equal to its kinetic energy per second. That's certainly not the case
it implies that the train is powerful enough to accelerate to the speed in 1s, which is definitely not true.
But that's just my interpretation.
Yeah, I forgot that a large part of the energy is in inertia and not the pulling of the engine.