this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
312 points (96.2% liked)

196

16721 readers
2220 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

do evil games expect evil prizes, thank you Rainer Forst

edit: this is a pedagogical post, not a philosophical one. i actually fully agree with the paradox of tolerance and its conclusion! i just find that it doesnā€™t work as well as an educational tool for introducing people to the concept. sorry for any confusion :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[ā€“] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So here's the thing, as I see it.

Ultimately we need to tolerate everyone. Everybody is entitled to the same rights and protections. (Ideally, this would include food, shelter, safety, family, access to important media, access to sports events...all the things we find important, but I digress).

The problem is, everyone (seriously everyone ) thinks that someone should be excluded. Popular examples are people who commit heinous crimes: child predators, rampage killers, serial killers, and far right interests will typically use them to set precedent that some people need to be shot, or locked up in abusive conditions, or subject to excessive searches, or not allowed to speak, or whatever, and then those precedents are expanded to include anyone they can associate with them, and the next thing you know, liberals are rumored to have a child-trafficking sex ring in the basement of the Comet Ping Pong pizzeria. Also women don't have the right to vote because fetuses are more persons than their mothers are.

But we're not even there yet: Only recently has the LGBT+ community decided that trans folk and enbies are people too, and deserve to march in the regular pride parade (rather than their own side-mini-parade). This is one of the reasons the far right is attacking the trans community, because they're easy prey and the militants expect little resistance from the mainstream.

Another example: Even here on Lemmy, discussions of furries leads to suggestions and arguments that all furries are furverts into yiffing, when most of them just like adventures and dramas featuring anthros that might be other than Disney and Warner Bros. Looney Tunes. Observe also, rumors from the right wing about liberal schools providing litterboxes for catgirl children.

So yes, the problem of othering is epidemic. When it comes to people who actually committed crimes, we still can't help ourselves but just dump them in the (squallid, abusive, sometimes for-profit) prison industrial complex figuring they deserve the soap jokes featuring Bubba, but they too deserve real protections as per the Bill of Rights in the Constitution of the United States. They too deserve to be treated humanely, and when we don't we find that those guilty of possession (of cannabis for medical purposes) also get imprisoned in squalid abusive conditions, as do women seeking abortions.

It helps to think of those who committed terrible crimes as broken like a toaster, rather than evil like a Disney villain. And if you're happy to wish them eaten by hyenas, then yeah, eventually those who are insufficiently patriotic and loyal to Dear Leader (or is just no longer useful now) will also end up in the hyena pit at dinnertime. Granted, some of our super-antisocial citizens are beyond our current capacity for treatment, but then our response should be to R&D more effective treatments, and in the meantime, keep them well and preserve their rights as much as possible, as if they're disabled in the brain, not as if they're self-aware monsters.

This is incredibly hard to do, and as the 2024 general election shows, the general population is easy to convince to just let the hyenas -- or in this case the leopards -- eat the faces of the marginalized, and risk that the leopards might still be hungry once there are only mainstream faces left to eat.

And that's to say, I know the society I want, but I have only a small fraction of the clues of how to get there. And I'm not sure there are enough of us who want that same society. šŸŽ¶ You might say that I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one... šŸŽµ

And I'm not even sure human society could get there from here before we run out of water and the climate crisis turns into a giant population correction (featuring not just famine, but war, natural disasters, Mad Max and cannibalism; It's going to be a big mess).

[ā€“] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No, we do not need to tolerate everyone, because everyone includes neo nazis. We should not tolerate neo nazis. The same goes for any other group that intends to act, or acts to harm others. That includes CEOs who make a buck off of intentionally keeping people ill, dying, or dead for the sake of their company's bottom line.

The only way to solve the paradox of intolerance is to not tolerate that shit.

[ā€“] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, we need to find a way to tolerate absolutely everyone, down to the worst monster.

Granted if someone makes a racist statement in public, it is still appropriate to treat them as if they just puked their last five drinks in the middle of the bar. If someone commits a hate crime, it's still right and proper to arrest and detain them and try to figure out how they've gone mad.

But even fascists, neo-nazis and members of the white Christian nationalist movement deserve to have their rights respected (to the extent we can allow while preserving the safety of the community), which includes due process, and fair treatment while detained.

Firstly, we human beings are prone towards bigotry (what is likely -- we aren't absolutely certain -- was how human tribes protected themselves from infectious disease, case in point, COVID-19 spreading worldwide inside a year), and secondly we have to assume that antisocial behavior is not a character flaw, but a physiological problem, even if we don't immediately have treatment for it yet.

Generally, in functional societies, racial supremacy movements and religious-political movements don't get much purchase except due to large amounts of precarity, and they can be mitigated further with information- and electoral-literacy. Or in Marxist speak moving more people from the lumpen-proletariat into the proletariat. And yes, it's a problem because working people harder in the factories not only reduces political involvement but also parenting, resulting in intergenerational neglect and dysfunction.

Sadly, our ownership class prefer to be kings of a petty banana state than middle managers in an intergalactic civilization. And it's so consistent among the ownership class that again, it looks like mental illness or a human bias, which is why they put only tiny fractions of their wealth into public works, and then ones that won't ever threaten their position as a patrician.

But even fascists, neo-nazis and members of the white Christian nationalist movement deserve to have their rights respected (to the extent we can allow while preserving the safety of the community), which includes due process, and fair treatment while detained.

That is a separate, different issue than tolerance. You've moved the goal posts.