this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
337 points (97.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3586 readers
306 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, most military jobs are support regardless, I met plenty of weak men in the army while I was in. Women make great soldiers if you understand what the functionality of being a soldier is.

It’s not all spec ops and crazy missions, the majority of the military is planning and execution. No matter the make up of the platoon.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm sure it's highly context-dependent. I've just never viewed the "equal access to exploitation" school of gender equality as quite the social victory others seem to.

To frame it another way - we've historically sent men to war partly because their relative disposability is understood. The strength to swing a sword and the strength to bear a child are not necessarily fungible.

I remain conflicted on the issue.

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

I would reckon that for a volunteer force, it's on the individual's perception of valid goals. Of course not withholding anyone coerced into the volunteer force.