this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
624 points (97.3% liked)

News

23275 readers
3456 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Business says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

…Yeah, do you realize how bad taste it is to compare not letting cops in to Jim Crow discrimination against Black folks? Y’know, the people cops kill a lot?

I see what you’re trying to do, but…can you please not.

[–] knightry@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait, are you replying to me or the person I was replying to? Because you're saying the exact same thing I was, but you're getting up voted and I'm getting down voted and now it feels like everyone is misunderstanding my post lol.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To you, and that “No colored allowed.”

[–] knightry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess nuance doesn't always come across on the internet.

I was pointing out that allowing businesses to reject anyone for any reason doesn't go over well. The "no color allowed" was common signage from segregated businesses in Jim Crow era times.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know, which is why I said I get where you were coming from, but it was still in poor taste.

[–] knightry@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wasn't comparing, I was simply responding to the ops statement,. if I was responding to your post, I would have made a top-level comment, not a reply to a specific commenter. In no way is rejecting cops the same as racism, and for the record I'm all for the former. I just didn't like the notion of the original ops comment, which is why I replied to them and not to you.

[–] mob@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are getting a funny reaction but I get you.

Dude said legalize "no questions asked discrimination" and you referenced a very well known example of discrimination in recent history. Seemed like a logical response to me.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, but the issue is using that particular example in a post talking about police.

Also, as a Black American, it’s really tiring when we and discrimination against us get pulled out to use as examples. Like, just keep us out of it some times.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know what you're not getting. Your post was about police specifically. The top comment of this chain days for any reason whatsoever, which could include, but is not limited to, race. The post isn't wrong, the top level comment here is because some people would use the liberty of blocking anyone they want to ban people of color, which has happened in the past hence the example.

[–] mob@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thats goofy.

You're telling me that id the conversation starts with cops, you agree with someone saying "they should be able to turn anyone away, no questions asked."?

Dude didn't say discriminating against cops is the same as discriminating against black people.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Everyone is misunderstanding your post. Add the words "your suggested policy could lead back to" before the sign you were referencing. I only finally got that context by reading the entire thread just now