We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
πwiki
Pantone 448 C is a colour in the Pantone colour system. Described as a drab dark brown and informally dubbed the "ugliest colour in the world", it was selected in 2012 as the colour for plain tobacco and cigarette packaging in Australia, after market researchers determined that it was the least attractive colour.
Is that what a pack of cigarettes looks like over there? Yeesh!
If you think the pack is shocking, do not look at the price.
$50 for a pack of 25, talk about exploiting free choice
Wow, I had no idea it goes so high. Good for Australia, though. Cigarettes are cancer, literally.
Wow, that's insanely high! I wonder if that hasn't had the adverse effect of accidentally turning cigarettes into a sort of "status symbol" item in some places, as you gotta have a good chunk of expendable income to afford a habit like that.
So you're saying the Aussies found a way to tax the rich while simultaneously shortening their lifespan?
Don't worry, if you don't have enough you just spend half of your earnings on them
Basic economics. Always tax something with inelastic demand.
Well and the fact that smokers will rely more heavily on the free health system - it's in the government's interest to prevent people smoking to save money.
That argument floats around a lot.
At least in my country, cigarettes contribute in taxes 4 times the amount that smokers take out of free healthcare system. Note that we don't have any "smoking-related stats", so everything's included - if you break a leg and you're a smoker, it's included in the figure.
Also note that the numbers are few years old but I don't think the ratio might have changed that much towards smokers contributing less, especially with the constant price increase for cigarettes.
Are you serious? What in the heck? Are the tobacco lobbyists powerless? They used to run the damned world at one point not too long ago. I mean it's great that people are abandoning cigarettes, but this is surprising.
They lost like two decades ago.
Theyβve moved to mainly selling to 6 year old kids in Indonesia as they know they lost here.
Why would parents let their 6 year old kids smoke cigarettes? There's very little chance that toddlers are able to get cigarettes without parental assistance.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/in-indonesia-big-tobacco-hasnt-got-a-worry-20120825-24tlu.html
https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/journal_contribution/Cigarette_retailer_density_around_schools_and_neighbourhoods_in_Bali_Indonesia_A_GIS_mapping/8940548
So they're terrible parents. Of course he really wants it, he's physically addicted at six years old with zero emotional maturity, or impulse control. It is their job as parents to ensure their child establishes healthy habits, and teach him how to be a human. Six year old kids don't obtain money freely. Obviously his parents are enabling him.
The issue is the society that has shops near schools and the shops that actually accept the money from the children. Not to mention the cigarette companies themselves targeting the these high growth markets for this very reason.
Iβm not going to blame some poor parents in the 3rd world for not having the same degree of security and free time to spend with their children as we are privileged to.
Same in the UK. They all look like that and have done for years now
My mate usually asks for a pack without the dead kid on it
They put a picture of a dead kid on a pack of cigarettes? Why? Cigarettes kill you very slowly, long after childhood. Just for the ugliness? That seems a step too far if it's completely unrelated to the risks of smoking.
Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, and child mortality soon after birth. Second hand smoke isn't healthy for babies, either. It increases the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, among other, slower and probably more painful ways of dying.
You simply do not get it.
Shocking images like that put off new smokers and young adults, especially of the new generation who are very health and image conscious. It is working.
The pictures are not very accurate. And from the times I was a smoker, I remember everyone just making fun of them.
Haha yes thatβs what they look like in many countries
Over where? Literally all cig packs I know look like that
Australia, which is in the caption for the picture. They don't look like that in the US. Where are you?
Outside of the US
Surprise surprise, you're not the center of the world, and in fact you're the ones doing the opposite of what the rest of the planet does
Wow, you're overtly hostile for no reason at all. Good luck with that.
When you've been seeing Americans thinking the rest of the world is weird for not doing things only they do for years you tend to be tired of them