this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
808 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6036 readers
2113 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] phcorcoran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's typically the argument regarding being apprehensive about the government knowing your medical & family history; there's historical precedent of governments making very not good laws based on those.

Before WW2, the nazis basically outlawed being Jewish or Roma. A more recent example would be outlawing being gay or trans in some countries

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd argue there's a much bigger historical precedent or governments not abusing that information and instead using that info to make informed policy decisions.

If your government does that you have bigger problems than personal privacy and data collection.

[–] phcorcoran@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I do agree with you on that. I think it's worth considering but it's not inherently decisive