this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
50 points (80.5% liked)

Technology

60013 readers
2567 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you’ve been in an echo chamber for too long.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] michael@lemmy.chrisco.me 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't had any issues with .world. Ive had more issues with smaller instances banning people/topics. World seems like the most bland or popular of the lemmy instances.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most of the issues I have with world are invisible because the comments are removed and the users are banned. As long as you stick with their narrative (that Trump bad and Biden/Kamala good) you won't run afowl of them.

[–] michael@lemmy.chrisco.me 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cant you see everything via the modlist + API? I thought that was one of the benefits of Lemmy is that the modlist is open. I have seen people down-voted for specific comments but not banned.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Many have been banned. A leftist named linkerbaan (or to like that) was one for sure.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The discussion here shows me that linkerbaan's ban was the right decision: https://p.lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/lemmy.dbzer0.com/29384791 . Please provide receipts of actual attempted Orwellianism.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

After looking at your “evidence”, I still disagree with the ban. Linkerbaan was angry at people literally preventing the truth about an actual genocide being broadcast live for all to see.

Downvote those you disagree with and walk away. Banning is for death threats and stuff like that. Calling people names like “fascist” is not abuse. It’s public discourse.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's outright lying, this thread of what I can only describe as trolling, chanting "what about clinton's blowjob" on a post asking for people to debunk a list of bad things Reagan did, and there's a ton of calling everyone Zionists within the very thread I linked to. Such spreading of vitriol at everyone he disagrees with is definitely bannable IMO.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Calling someone a Zionist when they’re arguing AGAINST a ceasefire is ABSOLUTELY not below the belt. Zionist isn’t a slur. It’s a word used by actual Zionist’s.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Calling someone zionist is not a slur. Calling someone a bot is also not a slur. Both are thought-terminating cliches. Also, by thread, I meant including the comments as well. Plus you have the trolling.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can agree that they’re cliches and perhaps thought terminating.

I “have the trolling”. Are you implying that I’m trolling? If I’m trolling, every single hippie in the 60’s was also trolling when they asked for peace.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

you have the poweeeer

haha no. i meant the examples of trolling i provided lol, not you.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago

Oh ok. Carry on.