this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
808 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6036 readers
2136 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What she is talking about is the data the Chinese government collects about its people like where you go when, who you meet, what you buy, what you talk about, who you're friends with, if you are pregnant or not, etc.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or what the NSA collects about Americans... like where you go when, who you meet, what you buy, what you talk about, who you're friends with, if you are pregnant or not, etc.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's what decisions are made with that data that's the concern. A lot of "privacy advocates" believe that society can exist with the government not knowing anything about their population. I can't think how:

  • a transport service can operate without knowing where people go and when
  • consumer advocacy can work without knowing what people will buy
  • what needs to be addressed in society without knowing what the issues are
  • what to educate people on unless you find out what they don't know
  • a health service can adapt to the needs of aging populations without good fertility data

You're right, all this data can be used against someone for malicious reasons and like in the China example it's easier to locate dissonance by listening. But evil can be done without data collection, it's impossible to do good without it.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't need personalized data to do those things. You can just count how many people use the bus instead of checking for every person where they are going when and why.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 2 points 3 weeks ago

I agree that aggregate data is the best way to improve things for the most number of people, you can't help every single person, but also knowing the edge cases helps you find out things you don't know.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks for providing context I probably should have checked to see what she was referring to.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The duch have a specific data set they hoped not to have collected. They collected everyone's religion.

So when the Nazis came it was especially easy to find all the Jews in the Netherlands. In other countries they had to collect that data first.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yea but I don't blame the Dutch for collecting that data since it was the Germans going door to door looking for jews. They did that because they wanted to not because they had the data to do it.