this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
16 points (90.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40382 readers
516 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
16
Old Mini PC with 3.5" HDD (lemmy.ml)
submitted 16 hours ago by dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

are there any older ex-office mini PCs like the elitedesk, optiplex, thinkstation, etc models that can fit a 3.5" drive? Not looking for anything new and thus expensive, just want some old junker (6/7/8th gen Intel) that can host some light stuff. thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Why 3.5" drive? (Just curious).

I've found prices aren't necessarily any better at that size.

[–] dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml 1 points 59 minutes ago

they are widely available and cheap.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not the OP, but capacity: there aren't 20TB 2.5 drives.

(Or 18, 16, 14, 12, or 10TB ones, for that matter....)

Kinda a dead-end product since laptops are all on SSDs, and enterprises have flocked to SSDs as well and that was essentially the entire market for that size of HDD.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Putting that much data on just one drive freaks me out

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Raid builds hurt financially up front but can save you from a lot of heartache later, even with larger disks.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Totally. I've got an 8TBx4 RAID5 that has about as much space as one 20TB spinning drive, but with the advantage that if one fails I don't lose anything.

Putting 20TB on one drive though? That's too risky for me.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago

I mean, 20TB drives will work in an array just as well as 8TB 😉

Honestly with the price of refurb enterprise drives, it's really hard not to justify not going that route and just keeping a spare drive formatted on warm standby at all times.

A bit of a digression though, since OP isn't looking to cram a bunch of drives into an old mini case.

[–] SweetMylk@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That's why you use 2 and have backup.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Two is one and one is none.