Selfhosted

40645 readers

246 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Tell me why I shouldn't use btrfs (lemmy.zip)

submitted 3 weeks ago by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

114 comments fedilink hide all child comments

About a year ago I switched to ZFS for Proxmox so that I wouldn't be running technology preview.

Btrfs gave me no issues for years and I even replaced a dying disk with no issues. I use raid 1 for my Proxmox machines. Anyway I moved to ZFS and it has been a less that ideal experience. The separate kernel modules mean that I can't downgrade the kernel plus the performance on my hardware is abysmal. I get only like 50-100mb/s vs the several hundred I would get with btrfs.

Any reason I shouldn't go back to btrfs? There seems to be a community fear of btrfs eating data or having unexplainable errors. That is sad to hear as btrfs has had lots of time to mature in the last 8 years. I would never have considered it 5-6 years ago but now it seems like a solid choice.

Anyone else pondering or using btrfs? It seems like a solid choice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 56 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

A bit of topic; am I the only one that pronounces it "butterface"?

[–] wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not anymore.

[–] myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 37 points 3 weeks ago

You son of a bitch, I'm in.

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago

Ah feck. Not any more.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't it meant to be like "better FS"? So you're not too far off.

[–] Asparagus0098@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

i call it "butter FS"

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

I was meant to be Better FS, but it corrupted it to btrfs without noticing.

[–] adept@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Related, and I cannot help but read "bcachefs" as "bitch café"

[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

I call it butter fuss. Yours is better.

[–] combatfrog@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Similarly, I read bcachefs as BCA Chefs 😅