this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
716 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

5373 readers
1274 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It seems hypocritical from my standpoint. He can use private property as much as he wants for his art, but no one can infringe on his god given copyright? He can't have it both ways, either they are both in the wrong or neither of them are.

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

The problem is this isn't a person using his art, it's a company using it to make more money. So in this case he can have it both ways.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't necessarily agree with the person you responded to, and I could be wrong here but I don't really think Banksy is actually invoking their copyrights, just using it as an idea to criticize private property in general. Similar to how your own "god given copyright" is in itself a criticism. It's more like, "look our property laws that are meant to protect the art-maker mean nothing to big companies. Why should the property laws that are meant protect big companies mean anything to us?"

I get how you could see it as hypocritical, but I think fundamentally Banksy probably isn't advocating for stronger copyright laws here...

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This it it. Banksy's not demanding money there. What's noted is that Guess has decided to join in and therefore its property is publicly up for grabs.