this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
156 points (80.5% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2268 readers
390 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Stop saying Trump didn't steal the election.

his lawyers literally had the voting software stolen, as court documents show, and it's a historical and statistical stark improbability that this many people only voted for the president on their ballots, only in the seven swing states, and only with just enough of a margin to avoid a manual recount.

you clearly didn't read the article.

these are facts that computer security experts are putting forth as evidence that the election was manipulated.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

You clearly didn't watch the video (how could you within 1 minute). It references the guy who wrote the first open letter.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"It references the guy who wrote the first open letter."

did you watch the video?

her conclusion is, "that guy was right before, the Republicans did steal the election in 2000, but maybe he isn't correct this time?"

maybe. let's do the recounts and see if those votes are there.

I think it makes sense to listen to the guy who was right about the Republicans stealing the election last time since we have evidence that they tried to steal the election 4 years ago, like straight up admitted by the electors who committed fraud.

your video supports my point.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago (12 children)

her conclusion is, "that guy was right before, the Republicans did steal the election in 2000, but maybe he isn't correct this time?"

lol, nope. Not what she said in the video. That guy didn't complain in 2000. He did so in 2004, though.

You didn't watch it.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago

also, the first open letter was written by eight different computer scientists who are not the guy you're trying to nitpick about.

Stop making things up.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I've seen that defeatist video several times.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rebecca Watson right-wing? 🤣🤣🤣

Yeah, sure you did. /s

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

" Rebecca Watson right-wing"

Why do you think she's right-wing?

"Yeah, sure you did"

Just because you don't care about the facts doesn't mean nobody else does.

enjoy your nitpicking.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You claimed she was right wing and then edited your comment. What the fuck are you trying to pull off here.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

sorry I edited a comment before you replied to it.

you could have actually made a point.

must be rough.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. and then you acted as if you never called her right-wing.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you're just going to keep making things up?

super convincing.

no wonder you don't like numbers.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you don't even admit that you called her right wing?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

nope, sorry you're making that up too.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What did you edit your comment for, then. You called her right wing twice and then edited it to say first "lying", then "defeatist".

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

you are making things up.

then you accuse me of lying by not agreeing with your fantasies.

besides, despite agreeing with me on all three points , If she's defeatist enough to support Trump winning this election despite admitting the evidence is they're supporting a recount, she's right-wing enough for me.

you are too, just like everybody else supporting Trump.

bye.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are quite a good example of a blueAnon user. Have fun in your fantasy world where everyone but you is stupid and right wing.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The very fact that you use the word blueanon unironically one presented with concrete facts is kind of tipping your hand.

but keep riding on your unicorns or whatever, I really don't mind if you tell yourself stories to feel better.

i know some people feel like they need those stories

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

concrete facts

lol

I've never necountered the term before. But your delusional, lying style is exactly how I would picture democrat simps who drink a Qanon style kool-aid

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

you literally don't believe in the fake electors game?

none of the convictions, none of the affidavits, none of the courtroom admissions reported on are real to you?

you just live in this fantasy world where only the things you've heard of before from YouTube videos exist?

I mean it checks out, but...you must have a rough life If you have to make that many things up.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Edit your comment. I don't understand squat.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

no, that one looks good.

edit: forgot a comma

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

*courtroom admissions

okay, that one was pretty bad.

sorry, I've got like three other people who have never heard of the fake elector's plot talking to me at the same time as you are, so I have to basically explain it over and over to you guys.

and then you're like yeah. but what about conspiracies not being real?

haha, nope, there are groups of people that do things together.

happens all the time.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

sorry, I've got like three other people who

Then that's on you. Don't multitask that much if you'd like to be taken seriously.

sorry, I've got like three other people who have never heard of the fake elector's plot talking to me at the same time as you are, so I have to basically explain it over and over to you guys.

As I've already pointed out. I know of that shit and I don't think it's plausible that it would have worked this year if it was already public and didn't work 4 years ago. Also: I don't care. I'm not an electoralist. Stop wasting your time with elections.

haha, nope, there are groups of people that do things together.

Yup. Guess what: the conspiracyis that electoralism alone will lead to progressive change.

I'll take my own advice and not waste any more time with your stupid conspiracy theories of your useless elections. I'd suggest you'd do the same, sugarplum.

Next rude comment will result in a permanent block.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

you can go read the other three people, they literally agreed with me.

you're the only one pretending that the fake electors scheme didn't happen and that manipulating voting software is impossible if you have the voting software for 3 years.

"I don't think it's plausible "

you didn't even understand how software manipulation worked until I explained it to you in ice cream.

I'm going to believe all of the computer scientists brave enough to write an open letter saying that software based voting manipulation is plausible.

"I'll take my own advice and not waste any more time"

I remember you telling me you weren't going to talk to me anymore a dozen comments back.

"stupid conspiracy theories of your useless elections. I'd suggest you'd do the same, sugarplum."

there are conspiracy theories and conspiracy facts, Jack.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

you are delusional.

I watched your silly video.

do you also not believe in the fraudulent electors scheme that has been documented and happened and people have been convicted for?

do you not believe in the call Trump made to Georgia to try to literally create votes out of nothing?

you can post baseless YouTube videos all you want, they don't contradict the facts.

load more comments (14 replies)