this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
12 points (83.3% liked)

Linguistics

532 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
  2. Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
  3. Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
  4. Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptObvious 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tangent re: New Yorker: I’m about to host-block websites that drop a non-dismissible paywall over the browser and force a quit-and-restart

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] CaptObvious 2 points 1 week ago
[–] koavf@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't that just pirating copyrighted material?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that it's in a grey area, but if the site were to sue someone it would be the archive, not people linking it, so it's safe for us.

[–] koavf@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not concerned with being sued, I'm just asking if it's copying someone's work when that person (or whomever holds the copyright) hasn't allowed it to be copied. Is that what's happening here?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, got it.

I'm not too sure but I think that it's weak copyright infringement (piracy), indeed. However the content being available for free from the site itself, plus the lack of enforcement of its copy rights, muddies a bit the matter.

[–] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it is in fact a copyright infringement, then I'm not going to be posting that.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

That's fair. Never mind the request then.