People Twitter

5383 readers

1317 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1019

Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

113 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

when used for factual purposes

I think the point of the post is that anyone who uses it for this is a fucking moron.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally the only use I've found for it that's better than any other alternative is describing a thing to it that you can't remember the name of. It's usually right, and when it's wrong you were probably never gonna find the thing on your own anyway.

But I don't go to it first, only when I can't figure out how to find the name any other way.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I've used it when I'm looking for a specific function I don't know the name of, and then I go read the documentation.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

That's true, and my point is that the post didn't say that. The post specifically said something different that was not true.