this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
477 points (98.8% liked)

Sysadmin

7688 readers
601 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Spent the last 3 months getting requirements for computer upgrades. After that picked out some decent laptops. (Thinkpad L and T series)

Nothing fancy, but I'm just tired of diagnosing problems with previous sysadmin purchased Vostro laptops.

After getting quotes from multiple vendors, finally got everything and sent the CEO to confirm. Guess fucking what... It got fucking denied.

"Look for cheaper laptops and replace only whats critical"

Employees are rocking 7 year old laptops with 128G SSDs! The bloody things can't even run Win 11! The whole upgrade costs less than their single "teambuilding"! I hate this these cheapskates so fucking much...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] shininghero@pawb.social 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly not surprising. You gotta spin it in terms they prefer, like productivity, profits, and ROI. Otherwise they assume it's an expense with no gains.

[โ€“] tomcatt360@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago

Calculate how much time is lost by the delays and crashes caused by old hardware. If you can break down how expensive not upgrading is, it might be easier to sell the upgrade. You could also break down the upgrade into waves, replacing only a third (or maybe a fourth) of the machines each year, starting with the oldest, and with the users who rely on them most. Another benefit to the wave approach is that you'll reduce the likelihood of having to do another big upgrade every 3-4 years.