People Twitter

5234 readers

818 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

271

Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 hours ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I’m convinced people who can’t tell when a chat bot is hallucinating are also bad at telling whether something else they’re reading is true or not. What online are you reading that you’re not fact checking anyway? If you’re writing a report you don’t pull the first fact you find and call it good, you need to find a couple citations for it. If you’re writing code, you don’t just write the program and assume it’s correct, you test it. It’s just a tool and I think most people are coping because they’re bad at using it

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Yeah. GPT models are in a good place for coding tbh, I use it every day to support my usual practice, it definitely speeds things up. It's particularly good for things like identifying niche python packages & providing example use cases so I don't have to learn shit loads of syntax that I'll never use again.