this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
192 points (99.5% liked)

World News

32327 readers
390 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON, Nov 17 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's administration will allow Ukraine to use U.S.-provided weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, three sources familiar with the matter said, in a significant change to Washington's policy in the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

Ukraine plans to conduct its first long-range attacks in the coming days, the sources said, without revealing details due to operational security concerns.

The move by the United States two months before President-elect Donald Trump takes office on Jan. 20 follows months of requests by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to allow Ukraine's military to use U.S. weapons to hit Russian military targets far from its border.

The change follows Russia's deployment of North Korean ground troops to supplement its own forces, a development that has caused alarm in Washington and Kyiv.

The first deep strikes are likely to be carried out using ATACMS rockets, which have a range of up to 190 miles (306 km), according to the sources.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org -2 points 1 day ago (7 children)

the people living there more strongly identified with Russia, wanted to be able to keep speaking Russian without persecution, and eventually pleaded with Russia to intervene on their behalf, which Russia fortunately did

this is the first time I hear this story. the previous story was "cleaning out nazis" or something like that. it seems goalposts have grown wheels

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Learning a second thing isn't some kind of subterfuge wth

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org -4 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

this is not "learning some second thing", but learning that the deal was altered

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

What deal? What are you talking about?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

it was an attempt to refer to the phrase "I've altered the deal, pray I don't alter it further"

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago

Okay so you've clarified the incoherent thought behind your incoherent words. Is that it then?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)