this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
29 points (79.6% liked)

shitposting

1633 readers
645 users here now

Rules •1. No Doxxing •2. No TikTok reposts •3. No Harassing •4. Post Gore at your own discretion, Depends if its funny or just gore to be an edgelord.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

But that would mean changing basic human nature. It would be great to be able to enjoy life without the constant worry about being able to support yourself and live a decent lifestyle. But since we can't change human nature, everyone would have to be drugged some how to hold you in check. There was a movie about something like this "Equilibrium"

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

What's considered "Human Nature" changes based on the Mode of Production.

Secondly, I have no idea what you're talking about when you say everyone needs to be drugged to be "held in check." What on Earth are you talking about? If you don't know what Communism is, you can try my Introductory Marxist-Leninist reading guide, Principles of Communism in section 1 should give you a great base.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Human nature is quite literally to cooperate to survive, not compete. Competition is literally the opposite of how hominids evolved. It's genuinely a terrible strategy.

[–] sheepy@lemm.ee -3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

To survive, yeah maybe. To thrive? Hah, no.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Tribes have always thrived over individuals, and will always. Humans are pretty shit animals; but as a coequal group working towards the same goal? We're amazing. When we favor individuals, or stratify our groups, we die.

[–] sheepy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

You are once again missing the point: on a person to person basis, in a survival situation, yes, humans are hyper selfless and cooperative. We are not in such a situation. It's naïve to think that, given a clean start, all 8 billion of us would get peacefully along with each other.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 2 points 25 minutes ago

We are in a survival situation, at least most of us are; but that's besides the point. No, it's not naive to think that humans would follow human nature if those preventing it for their own profit were removed. It's the logical conclusion of studying the material reality of people's lives. Identify the sociopaths, eliminate them, and congrats, no one has any incentive to not follow human nature.