science

14806 readers

413 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

148

Scientists Took Semen Onto A "Vomit Comet" Flight, And The Results Were Concerning (www.iflscience.com)

submitted 20 hours ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/science@lemmy.world

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Exposure to short duration gravity load changes including microgravity, as sustained in a parabolic flight statistically significantly decreases the sperm motility and vitality of human fresh sperm samples," the team found, adding that this may have huge importance for any prolonged human settlement missions in space.

"In the future, should humans remain in space for long periods of time with exposure to different microgravity and hypergravity peaks, which could range from months to a number of years, reproduction may pose a problem to be tackled."

The mechanism by which sperm motility was decreased remains unknown, with further study needed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The universe has plenty of room for more humans. There’s a shit ton of matter out there, if you can get to it.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No, I meant to say by there being suffering in the world, I meant in the universe, rather than specifically referring to this planet and there would be no human suffering in off Earth colonies.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

... Why not just say that then? It would save much confusion.

It'd be hard to say whether there would be no suffering in off-world colonies, but I should doubt it. Traditionally, colonisation has been a dangerous thing, and human nature is as human nature does. The best you can do is reduce it so that what suffering does occur is either minor, or ineffectual.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Today I seem really terrible at saying what I mean! 🤣

Whether on or off planet, humans anywhere will experience suffering, likely to an extent that far outweighs the pleasure they experience. Therefore it's unethical to create more humans if your goal is reduction of suffering.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

All life lives. Not just humans.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Very true. Creating more humans creates more suffering for all life.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So edgy

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -1 points 13 hours ago

What did you mean?