Technology

59415 readers

3175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

537

Comcast, Disney, and IBM Are Among Advertisers Returning to X After Ad Freeze (www.adweek.com)

submitted 2 days ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but why would they even need a machine to count the prisoners? If they didn't feed their victims and were planning to murder them anyways I'm having trouble understanding why they wouldn't be okay with just a loose head count. Was it really just for counting?

I hope I'm not coming across as insensitive, I've just never heard about this and it sounds so ominous.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

Black reports that every Nazi concentration camp maintained its own Hollerith-Abteilung (Hollerith Department), assigned with keeping tabs on inmates through use of IBM's punchcard technology.[2]: 351 In his book, Black charges that "without IBM's machinery, continuing upkeep and service, as well as the supply of punch cards, whether located on-site or off-site, Hitler's camps could have never managed the numbers they did."[2]: 352

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

What makes you think they didn't feed them?