this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
540 points (98.0% liked)

Comic Strips

12602 readers
3122 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never dissassociated more than when I heard my sweet grandmother tell me that Hillary was part of an evil cabal of witches who drink the blood of tortured babies for adrenochrome.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

What frustrates me is that it's not 100% insane, just 95%. There are Silicon Valley CEOs and others that regularly get transfusions of blood from younger, healthier people as a means of improving their own health. The New Yorker wrote about this and some other crazy life extension stuff happening in the Silicon Valley in 2017.

So no tortured babies or adrenochrome, but we do quite literally have people taking blood from the young in an attempt to extend their own lives.

[–] Texas_Hangover@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

Does that work? I'm feeling old and tired.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"Taking" blood does give it another extra sinister tinge over what's actually happening.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Fair enough, but I honestly find it ghoulish regardless of the surrounding terminology.

There are plenty of worse ways for people in good health to make money, and I understand the desire to improve one's personal health and prolong life (assuming you have one you enjoy), but there's just something I find deeply unsettling and intensely objectionable about it all.

Especially when there's all these "adrenochrome" and "vampire" crazy conspiracies giving them air cover so to speak.

Edit: I think what bothers me is that if it does work, it's restricted to the elite, and if it doesn't then we're negatively impacting the donor's health for no reason.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 3 points 12 hours ago

Fair enough, but I honestly find it ghoulish regardless of the surrounding terminology.

Oh yeah, I mean, obviously, no contention there.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I first heard about young blood transfusions in a podcast episode about Peter Thiel. He's the closest thing to a real world vampire.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The best part about it is that it actually is detrimental to their health. More transfusions means a higher risk of transfusion reaction if you really need it.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

Oh so it actually is a good thing. Just not for them.