Considering the whole CCCG design is lootboxes but for card games, requiring proxy holders to actually own the cards gives legitimacy to WotCs use of dark patterns to take advantage of cognitive biases and whales (people susceptible to gambling-related dark patterns).

So asserting one has to have an original is to condone the abusive marketing practices used in the game.

Which, as a sober MtG addict, I do not.

[–] CryptoRoberto@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought the entire point of a card game was partially collecting rare/hard to get cards. Not really my thing tho.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

There are some communities that are all about deckbuilding and allow participants to just make proxies of anything they don't have.

Typically in such games cards like Black Lotus are too far outside the power curve and are pre-disqualified. Most MtG tournaments only allow cards from the current basic set, the last major expansion and whatever minor expansions have been released since. And Black Lotus is no longer in print.

In fact, the lesser Lotus Petal was restricted then banned for being still outside the power curve.

[–] mihnt@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Some people play competitively and will buy only the cards they need off the second hand market.

Netdeckers do the same thing.