Linux

48220 readers

713 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

LF Distro (lemdro.id)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by MrTHXcertified@lemdro.id to c/linux@lemmy.ml

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I need recommendations for a stable release distro for OBS Studio livestreaming and light video editing. This machine will be shared between several users who are techies, although not necessarily Linux (they're coming from Windows). I don't want to worry about things breaking because of an update, or to start a shoot only to find problems once we're live.

Nvidia and nonfree codecs should be treated as first-class citizens. H.264 w/ AAC will be everywhere with this workflow.

Some thoughts:

Linux Mint Debian Edition: Currently my top choice. It just works?

Fedora Bazzite: My second choice, maybe with auto-update disabled. Seems a bit risky though in the case of security updates to packages.

OpenSUSE: I run Slowroll on my laptop and work desktop, however recent package management errors relating to codecs and the packman repo have spooked me away.

Debian: Release cadance seems too slow for my preference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I use Debian for anything that matters. The release cadence means that stuff just works and keeps working. You cannot beat the documentation and I've been using it for 25 years.

I'm not touching anything Redhat / Fedora with a barge pole.

Not sure what the attraction to Mint is.

Never used OpenSUSE.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Since you're a Linux old-timer, what's your beef with Fedora, if you don't mind sharing?

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a big question, but I don't trust Red Hat after the stunts they've pulled over the years. Here's a taste.

https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/23/red_hat_centos_move/

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah, I see. It doesn't particularly bother me, but I can appreciate why it might bother somebody else with different values.

Thanks!

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It goes well beyond bother.

In my opinion, the biggest issue is that software with a GPL licence is not permitted to be distributed without making the source code available, which Red Hat restricted to only paying customers, and in doing so added a licence restriction which is not permitted by the GPL.

They are now profiting off the work of every developer who ever contributed to the software they're selling and none of those people are getting paid.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago

I see that, now that you explain it that way. That does seem ethically questionable.

I'll have to take some time to learn more about the details, so I can make my own informed decision.