this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
592 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

5226 readers
2302 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] venia_sil@fedia.io 141 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Follow me on Threads

so, nothing has changed.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 155 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This thread is kind of wild. Do all of y'all understand that it's more the blatant endorsement and promotion of literal Nazis that is driving people off Twitter? It ain't the corporatization. We might not like that but to pretend like it's the same thing is fucking insane.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 18 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Facebook and its sister sites have been a hotbed of unmoderated nazi content for longer than some of the people in this thread have been alive.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

I feel like with Facebook it's more of a YouTube situation where they don't care as long as it makes them money and no major regulator raises their eyebrows. Which is despicable, don't get me wrong, but Twitter is not just doing that, it is actively endorsing these mfs

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

Facebook has been a hotbed of nazi communities for longer than twitter has been around.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We must have different experiences with facebook, because I see nazi rhetoric just as often there. It may not be as blatantly supported, but they certainly do nothing to keep it off of the platform.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But is the nazi rhetoric on facebook coming from the owners?

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It is intentionally amplified by the owners because that makes them money. We have more than enough knowledge to say that with confidence thanks to the empirical data and ex-employees.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Facebook spread disinformation from a junta that caused a genocide and the Zuck did nothing to stop that disinformation stream. He’s almost as bad as a Nazi.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 14 points 1 day ago

They aren't saying with their mouths, but they seem to be fine with it padding their wallets.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 10 points 1 day ago

Right? People seems to forgot there's mass exodus off facebook due to this exact issue and they still have this issue as of now, and also the protest against federating with Thread not too long ago.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Zuckerberg zucks Trump’s choad as much as Elon behind the scenes. It’s kinda worse in a way.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Meta admitted to tolerating election influencing, it doesnt matter in which direction, because it means they can be bought.