this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
65 points (94.5% liked)

Rust

6005 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
EdTheLegendary@programming.dev
kahnclusions@programming.dev
torcherist@programming.dev
65
Rust needs an official specification (tweedegolf.nl)
submitted 5 days ago by snaggen@programming.dev to c/rust@programming.dev
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

You can say the Rust implementation is wrong if it doesn't conform to the Reference. That is not the same as "you personally disagree with the behavior."

Rust's guarantees about the behavior of safe code are far stronger than anything C or C++ provides, with or without a formal spec.