United States | News & Politics

7124 readers

565 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 1 year ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] datszechuansauce@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Justify the existence of national parks then

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure why you're here 4 days later...but nothing in the constitution says they can't have national parks.

Again, the issue is just it has nothing to do with it. There's easily other avenues to go about than the constitution.

[–] datszechuansauce@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Why are you here? And if nothing in the constitution says we can't have national parks, nothing in it says we can't regulate a stable climate.

I don't even really disagree with you that there are better ways to go about it. It's just stupid to agree with their claim.