this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
401 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
2808 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
401
Top French newspapers sue X for unpaid use of their content (www.rfi.fr)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If the code automatically shows the article or summarizes it without clicking on the link, then yeah, that's infringement. It should only show the title and the link imo.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 39 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Except the summary is almost always literally the content the sites ask the sites linking them to show.

They have "please show this preview instead of a boring plain link" code.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This. They even provide the cover image to use. If they don't want embedding they could just block the request.

But they don't want to. They want to sell the cake and eat it too.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They want to sell the cake and eat it too..

Or they want to sell the cake and get paid for it.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

More like: They want to sell the cake and be paid when you recommend it to others.

Mind that news media don't pay when they link to social media, quote people, or even report what other media has reported. The real question is, if this law has any beneficial effect for society. I don't see how.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mind that news media don't pay

That's exactly what (maybe) violates the law.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You think people should pay X to link to tweets? Or generally for quotes?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No, I'm not saying anything about 'should'.

It's about a lawsuit here, and I have told that this may be what has violated the law.

The court will tell you for sure, in the end.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Misunderstanding. The news media is suing X. I pointed out what news media does without paying.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

It should only show the title and the link imo.

That's infringement in Europe, which makes it effectively a link tax.