this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
314 points (87.9% liked)

science

14812 readers
21 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When you are not an expert of the domain, it is easy to get mislead by arguments such as the one you gave, maybe you're correct, maybe you're misleading, I don't have the knowledge to verify by myself. That's why I need to rely on reputable source, and it's hard to do more reputable than a meta-analysis in Science. If you are correct, the rebuttal will eventually be published in a peer reviewed journal, I'll will be happy to read the conclusions then.

[โ€“] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

it's stated explicitly in the papers cited by poore-nemecek. all you need to do is read