So far it's just deflecting and deflecting. Why not just straight away and tell me you don't have any evidence to proof that China didn't do what they got accused of? Might save us some time going back and forth.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I posted any number of links to information on what actually happened at the beginning of this conversation, but you’re not going to engage with any of them, because you’re not actually interested in what actually happened; you’re interested in winning a debate on the internet. But the two or three people who are still reading this thread don’t seem to be impressed with your unserious line of argument.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why would i engage with deflection? You're not even trying to proof the finding wrong, merely justifying the reason, which is admitting human right violation indeed happened within China. And i have no desire to impress anyone from this instance.