this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
36 points (87.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54476 readers
401 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So, do any pirates here have a grasp in what this asshole feels towards piracy in general? Should we be worried? I'm worried he'll install an FCC that'll work against internet rights, that's one concern.

I'd like to hear what thoughts you have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 29 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

He is not going to appoint someone to the FCC. He is going to get rid of it. ISPs are going to be free to do whatever they want with no federal interference.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That also means people can do whatever they want with spectrum. Gonna fuck with Starlink and all kinds of other communications. Afterall, with no FCC, y'all can do whatever you want.

[–] flork@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago

This won't happen, what will happen is that he revokes the broadcast license of anyone who criticizes the administration and removes all consumer protections against privacy and surveillance. he will repeal section 230 for everyone except X and Truth social.

[–] flork@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago

He's not going to "get rid of it", he's going to corrupt it. Give spectrum to the biggest donors, reverse net neutrality, get rid of antitrust, revoke broadcast licenses of anyone who criticizes him.

[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Which might be a blessing in disguise? I mean, for the ISPs that have been actively fighting corporate interests from telling them what to do. With no governmental branch telling them what to do and not wanting to lose many subscribers lest they risk going out of business, then isn't that a net positive?

[–] flork@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago

He won't just get rid of it, he will wield it as a weapon against anyone who criticizes his administration

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

$1/mb is now the only plan in your area.

ISPs generally have few to zero competition, so I expect this will generally be awful in face of deregulation.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

My local ISP is run by Trumpers out of one little office nearby

I'd love a final reason to firebomb them after all the bullshit, honestly

[–] safesyrup@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Like 1$ for every mb/s or for every mb downloaded?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

The intended chair is a huge fan of data caps to increase profits, so I’ll give you one guess.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 22 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This would be a double edged sword. Without regulation, the ISP will work in whichever way grants them the most money.

This means that they probably won't go after copyright claims unless the rightsholders pay them first, but they will ramp up data collection efforts to sell to brokerage firms and will also engage in rate-limiting on high-bandwith use cases like streaming or torrenting unless you pay extra.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There will be a branch of government telling them what to do. It will just be the courts, as they're sued into oblivion by IP rights holders.

[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 6 hours ago

But that's like what's already been happening. It'll just be business as usual.