this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
26 points (88.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5197 readers
650 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

IMHO, probably not; musk seems interested in his own finances, and on pitting people against minorities so that they don't see him stealing from them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

When ever was musk slamming roadsters together in a garage?

Just like every other business he was involved, he didn't build the basics, he just bought himself in

Tesla was existing before him - when they actually slammed together a roadster in a garage - and with PayPal he only got on after they found their footing (and he fucked up with a competing product as far as I remember)

Without his start capital, he wouldn't have had anything.

I give him, that this is more than just luck, but it's much more him being known and having money, than him being a business genius - and I don't even want to talk about the technical side, because pretty much everything he said on this front was bullshit (from pure software, to automation and...ok, I can't really talk about rockets, but it also wasn't him who did the actual work)

In my opinion he is just a parasite, like most so called managers - and CEOs are just the queen of them

Edit: holy fuck, I made quite some typos...