this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
82 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2643 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Somehow, I really don't think this will be the time China will bankrupt.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Don't they have many trillions in reserves? Of course they won't be bankrupt

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Don’t they have many trillions in reserves?

Right now China has about 3.2 trillion in ForEx of all kinds and currencies which means that this bailout represents nearly half of the total.

ForEx is an extremely complicated subject, way too much for a single post, but it is essentially the lubricant for trade. If you don't have enough of it in the right currency on an hourly (or less) basis to support your imports and exports then the machine will seize up.

So what China is doing here is risky as hell and if it doesn't work they will soon have the same kind of financial problems that Iran does and that is stupendously bad for an export based economy.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The way I (state certified smoothbrain) think of it is this: Cash reserves serve as short time collateral when a state is shopping on credit (which states usually do). So your transactions need to be backed by a currency your trading partner is willing to accept.

Other reserves are exist, but these usually need to be converted first, which adds a layer of delay and transaction that makes it a more long term thing.

Not sure how correct it is, but I find that this oversimplification works and is correct most of the time.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

They're not going to do this with cash. They'll print up some paper money (eg. bonds) like everybody else and make the poor subsidize the rich via inflation.

https://www.ft.com/content/b2feba22-5064-4eb1-84b1-3003cac36def

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Bruh they can print the money for rich people just like USA does. It's the same capitalist system everywhere. The rich get richer and the poor continue to drown in inflation, etc.