Microblog Memes

5742 readers

1934 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31@lemmy.world

aeronmelon@lemmy.world

1879

I will judge, and I will not forget (slrpnk.net)

submitted 5 days ago by compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world

338 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ap news had a good article about how our voting machines are completely vulnerable to first hand attacks. I think they figured out how to do it. They had a LOT of help.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That could be an explanation if there wasn't a massive drop in turnout, which has a paper trail.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Turnout is irrelevant when the ability to hack the machines is well known. https://apnews.com/article/election-security-voting-machines-software-2024-80a23479d8a767ba9333b2324c4e424b

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Paper trail.

Hacking the machines would be useful for complaints that the counts weren't accurate, but wouldn't affect turnout. Republicans got the numbers they were expected to get, the lack of turnout hurt the Dems like it always does.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I agree. Let's do a paper ballot recount. See if they match what the machines say.