this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1373 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5714 readers
3874 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 132 points 1 day ago (9 children)

My pet theory is that Musk acquired Twitter to destroy one of the most effective platforms for anyone on the left to organize.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

He just straight up bought the cultural elite's own means of mass communication.

[–] chryan@lemmy.world 54 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You're giving Musk too much credit here.

He bought Twitter because a) he's addicted to it, and b) he rushed into a buying agreement he didn't get his lawyers to vet properly (probably due to his massively inflated "I understand more than anyone else" ego).

He wanted to back out of it, but faced a lawsuit that he was almost certainly going to lose, so had no choice but to go through with the sale. The lawsuit happened because the shareholders at the time realized the company was worth nowhere close to the inflated $44 billion he offered for it, so they weren't going to back down either.

Everything else that happened after the sale is a result of a man-child feeding his addiction and recuperate from the dumb deal he was legally forced to uphold.

[–] SupahRevs@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You are right on why he bought it. But he then got funding from outsiders who would benefit from it's transition away from effective gathering and communicating space

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

Yeah. I think MUSK bought it because it sounded cool and he got suckered into it. I think he got the funding for it because the people who funded him (like the Saudis) saw an opportunity to get an easy mark to break the system for them.

Omg how good it feels to see others with this feeling

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just wait for the quid pro quo. SpaceX was supposed to get us back to the moon on 3 billion dollars. They are now at 5 billion dollars, and all they have to show for it is a flaming husk of a booster caught by "the chopsticks".

For anyone who thinks that was some incredible accomplishment.. NASA has been landing rovers on Mars using truly incredible engineering that makes SpaceX look like a bunch of kids eating Baby Ruth bars in the sandbox.

So if Elon gets appointed to a government position and starts awarding Tesla and SpaceX all kinds of extended taxpayer-funded gravy grift, you will know your pet theory is 100% spot on.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

For anyone who thinks that was some incredible accomplishment.. NASA has been landing rovers on Mars using truly incredible engineering that makes SpaceX look like a bunch of kids eating Baby Ruth bars in the sandbox.

You're belittling and attacking the thousands of engineers and scientists who really built SpaceX, because their financier is a fascist sociopath. If you knew anything about this at all, you'd understand how exceptionally ignorant, naive, and disrespectful this is.

[–] lemmyllama@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Seriously. I have no love for Musk, but what the Space X team has accomplished is incredible. Wait until that guy finds out how much the SLS has cost so far, lmao.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago

They support him and therefore are each collectively guilty of his actions.

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Seriously? Did you just feign outrage for all those employees who blew up 5 billion in taxpayers dollars? The ones who jump up and down cheering like deranged cult members each time one of their rockets blows up, excited they received a Participation ribbon for coming in dead last?

You do realize SpaceX will never make it to the moon, much less Mars, right? I will never understand how people can watch Musk lie, OVER AND OVER, about his solar tiles, his Boring bullshit, his Hyperpoop, his full-self driving lies year after year after YEAR, but somehow think SpaceX is not run the same way, with the same lies.

SpaceX employees know they are designing shite, and they are just there for the paycheck. So yeah, much respect.

EDIT: Should we even discuss Leuders granting them the contract, then leaving NASA to work for SpaceX? SpaceX has missed EVERY SINGLE benchmark, every single deadline. Again, they were supposed to get us to the moon for 3B, and they are at 5B and can't get an EMPTY rocket into orbit. SpaceX is out of govt money, but that won't be a problem anymore, will it?

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

and can't get an EMPTY rocket into orbit.

I'm not here to argue any of the rest of you post but both of the last three star ship launches have been to orbital velocity but on a trajectory that purposely didn't go into full orbit.

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Musks culture has infiltrated SpaceX to warrant us to make some of those assumptions on the engineers that have currently stayed. Yes they've made accomplishments in actual propulsion engines but they've overpromised and underdelivered. Worse yet, on public linked posts from SpaceX team leads were spreading pro Russia anti NATO Muskaganda, completely unprofessional and it was praised by some dude I knew from my college who has been working there for a few years now. Their culture is trash and deserves to be ridiculed, and it's because of Musk influence.

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)
[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe but they've got me interested in how this actually compares to nasa from a financial perspective.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

The difference isn't whether or not NASA could do this. The difference is that NASA's been funded by an anti-intellectual plutocracy who'd prefer to get rich bombing peasants in the middle east than do anything which would actually benefit humanity.

SpaceX engineers were people inspired by NASA, and would've likely ended up at NASA if the 4 year election cycle didn't sabotage most projects.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

My money is on NASA 100%.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

And/or weaponize it for his buddies to do so instead...

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

That’s an awfully expensive political statement, even for Musk

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

True, but he's proven repeatedly that he's got far more money than sense.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Does it really matter if you have one billion or 200 billion?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Previously he could buy a company like Twitter on a whim. He’d probably have to think twice about doing that again, so there’s a noticeable loss of purchase power.

Then you see his solar company is gone, drilling never went anywhere, car company may be pinched.

At least what he spent to buy a seat in government was cheap (for him)

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 23 hours ago

It was on attack on progressives.

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 2 points 21 hours ago

Yep many people left twitter and did not return. Basically they are silent now.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I still think he bought into the Twitter files conspiracy.