Political Weirdos

720 readers

7 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
Follow Iemmy.world TOS
Don’t be a jerk

founded 3 months ago

MODERATORS

Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world

884

Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 3 days ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/political_weirdos@lemmy.world

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Or doesn't know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast"

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird..

It’s the best read of it I can manage though..

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Nah bro. He’s just copped to tryna fuck kids. Just republican shit.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write "you would be my bitches". Not polite, MAGA polite.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

I don't know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it's because I'm not into any sketchy shit.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's the step between mistress and partner.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh.......yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

At least with mistress's and partners consent is a key factor.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's an old term for a pleasure slave.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, concubinage was typically consensual.

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 9 points 3 days ago

By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I'm trying to remember the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase it here: 'In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.' https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.