this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31998 readers
1072 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By "push server" I mean something like Ntfy.sh.


Cross-posts

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dracs@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm self hosting both too. MollySocket's docs are pretty clear that it never gets an encryption key for your account, so it can't read your messages. It only gets/forwards alerts that something happened on your account AFAIK. So I'm not sure what data it has that's worth encrypting.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then why do have to use both, a unified push server and a mollysocket, if both are doing the exact same thing?

[–] dracs@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

The UnifiedPush server is intended to be a single source your phone can keep a persistent connection open to, rather than needing a connection per service/app (this is how Google's Firebase notifications work too).

As Signal doesn't support UnifiedPush, MollySocket keeps a permanent connection open to Signal's servers to listen for new activity and forward them to your UnifiedPush server. This saves your phone keeping a permanent connection open to Signal's servers and draining your mobile battery more.