Linux

48656 readers

596 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

515

Bitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linux (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://flathub.org/apps/com.bitwarden.desktop

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 108 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I love what Flatpak is doing for Linux desktop. Let it grow!

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not the ideal solution, but it is approachable and understandable for technically averse users. I think it's good to have, but I only used it for one package, and that was as a separate Steam install that included an old version of glibc that was used in a particular game's (Squad) anti-cheat until it updated it.

It's good for a stable platform, but each package needs it's own set of everything, which can be good (like the Steam example above having its own version of glibc instead of using the shared version on my system), it's a lot of bloat. I'm not using it unless I require it for some reason, but again it's nice to have around.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

I don’t think Flatpak is going to be compatible with Steam anyway in the long-term because layering container solutions doesn’t generally work very well, and Steam is going to want to use its own solution for better control over the libraries each game uses. Earlier versions used library redirection and some still do.

[+] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com -44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Kill it.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But y tho?

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

There's a big chunk of the Linux community that will always want to gatekeep it and push out anything that makes it easier for the layman to use

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wastes RAM and disk space (compared to package-manager installed applications) by storing more libraries on disk and loading them into RAM rather than just using the libraries already installed on the distro. It's probably better than Snap and Appimage though.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

That is definitely a sacrifice being made here I agree with you. It gives developers more control over exactly how their app runs, but it does mean less storage efficiency.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it even a problem for a desktop in 2024? Never had an issue with RAM or diskspace. And even for those that have, they can just not use flatpak until they upgrade, no reason to kill it.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I assume the "kill it" comment was a little tongue-in-cheek. On small SBCs, like a Pi, or old hardware, it could be a problem. I've seen people with flatpaks taking up 30GB of space, which is significant. I'm not sure how much RAM it wastes. I assume running 6 different applications that have loaded 6 different versions of Qt libraries would also use significantly more RAM than just loading the system's shared Qt libraries once.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't see a problem with Flatpak in this. It does what it's supposed to do. You find not using it better? That's great, that option is the default in all of the distributives.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I agree. I do use Flatpaks, Snaps, and Appimages sometimes if I can't find a suitable deb repo/package. Flatpak is the best out of the three because they do try to avoid too much duplication through runtimes. I also use Docker quite a bit, which has similar issues (and benefits).