this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
150 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1927 readers
446 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas’ top elections official told the U.S. Department of Justice on Friday its election monitors aren’t permitted in the state's polling places after the federal agency announced plans to dispatch monitors to eight counties on Election Day to ensure compliance with federal voting rights laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leverage@lemdro.id 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Plenty of precedent for federal government to get involved. Voting rights act (1965) would be the most recent significant example that comes to mind. Constitutionality at that time was challenged and upheld as the states were violating the constitution by disenfranchising African Americans.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If we currently had a voting rights act that pertained to voter attendance or required monitor access I'd agree with you. But we don't, so here we are.

I one hundred percent agree that Merrick Garland (or Biden even) could absolutely send agents down there to force compliance with federal monitoring. However I don't see that happening for a few counties in Texas.

https://www.npr.org/2023/06/08/1181131584/in-a-surprise-decision-the-supreme-court-reaffirmed-the-1965-voting-rights-act

https://www.britannica.com/event/Voting-Rights-Act