this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
164 points (98.2% liked)

Antiwork

8380 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the best way to attempt to implement a maximum wage is to tax the every loving fuck out of anyone make a certain amount ie, you make 10m/year a thats 100% progressive tax.

but it wont happen because humans are weak and the rich have bought the government.

[–] Wojwo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like corporate taxes being tied to the ratio of the highest compensated full time worker and the lowest compensated worker. Note that I specifically said compensation and not wages and full time worker and not employee.

If the highest compensation package is stock options worth 30 million and the lowest compensation is an "independent contractor", that scrapes by on 30k a year. The ratio is 1000, some standard equation would then define the corporate tax rate. Hopefully a ratio that high would be 100%

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Could they not just create separate companies to get around this?

You could apply the law across all companies in a conglomerate, forcing either competition to be more attractive than monopolizing or forcing the tax to take effect with potential harm to lower income targeted companies within the conglomerate, allowing competition at the lowest income levels to flourish while eliminating it among higher end brands.

I.e. either Yum Brands sells off taco bell in order to focus on higher end options like KFC, or taco bell essentially gets sold off to a new company without the same leadership.

It's flawed, like all attempts to keep capitalism in check, but it's easier to sell to a brainwashed public than any left wing option that would actually improve society instead of just slowing capitalism's journey towards the total enshittification criticality point.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Many countries would consider companies that are created like this just to “get around” a rule or law to be the same company. They consider the “spirit of the law”, and sometimes even give fines for attempting to skirt it like this.

[–] Wojwo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

That's why I said full time worker. If I work for company A, but 90% of my time is dedicated to company B. My effort primarily benefits company B, therefore my compensation counts to company B. Really causes a problem for companies that employs sweatshops.