this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
565 points (98.3% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] taladar@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could always tax by emissions and weight. EVs are not really the solution to the general car problem anyway. Mass transit is, at least in cities and other densely populated areas.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think we agree but I still need to point out: Individual transport will always be a requirement for living in rural areas. The β€œfuck cars” sentiment only makes sense in cities with more than ~3 million inhabitants.

[–] Arbic@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree with the sentiment on cars in the city, I'd say that it is already viable in much smaller cities. I live in a city with 350k inhabitants and I'm doing quite well without a car.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

For sure. But forbidding cars doesn't make sense until you have several millions of people in a single city.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you smoking lmao, do you seriously think anything below 3 million people is rural?

rural is when it takes you an hour to reach the nearest grocery store by car.

[–] andrai@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not rural, that's ultra remote wilderness. Like what place doesn't have a grocery store in a 100km radius? Some place deep in the Australian outback?

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Village of ~10k, nearest grocery store is 25min walk, 10min bike, 5min car.

There are also three smaller stores a 2 min walk away. Europe for reference

[–] andrai@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I sincerely doubt there is a a place in Europe outside of maybe remote Scandinavia or Russia where you can't get to a grocery store after driving for an hour.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i'm very curious what on earth your definition of rural is then, your parent's backyard?

[–] andrai@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

My definition of rural is a place with some semblance of human habitation that is not urban. A speck of land characterized by villages, farms or forestry. Where you have limited access to the amenities found in cities.

However, what village does not have a grocery store? Or at least not one in the next bigger village?

Do you have some examples of villages without a grocery store an hour of driving away?