this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
863 points (87.1% liked)

Political Memes

5393 readers
3256 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 day ago (26 children)

I cringe every time I see this come up.

Because it isn't what you actually mean, and the horrible logic of it makes it easy for the Lemmy Lefties to dunk on.

Of course a 3rd party vote isn't a vote for Trump any more than it is a vote for Kamala.

What it actually is is a discarded opportunity to vote against Trump. Which is also dispicable, but actually accurate.

Everyone knows that's what you mean by this, but the Lemmy Lefties will play dumb and latch onto that logical fallacy every time.

[–] Lyricism6055@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If nobody votes 3rd party then we'll never have a 3rd party candidate that matters.

It's like bicycle infrastructure. Nobody wants to ride bikes on a highway, but you won't see bike riders until there's a trail somewhere for them to ride on. You can say it never matters and that there aren't any cyclists out there, but you're wrong. I think there's a lot of Americans looking for another party right now.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 hours ago

Under FPTP, we'll never have a 3rd party candidate that matters.

The 2-party system is a direct, mathematical result of FPTP + time.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They loved Bernie and praised him to the skies.

Then he endorsed Biden and Harris.

Now he's a 'sheepdog' that rounds up people to be slaughtered.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

That's a new one, what are you referring to by him being a sheepdog?

Edit: Funny people on here and reddit just downvote people instead of replying when they post incorrect information and get asked about it

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

I saw "sheepdog" for the first time yesterday. As I stated in my first comment, I take it to mean that he's rounding up sheep to be slaughtered.

To me, expecting any candidate to be perfect is silly.

I like NYC Mayor Ed Koch's line. "If you agree with me 51% of the time, vote for me. If you agree with me 100% of the time, see a psychiatrist."

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago (59 children)

It's the trolley problem again. This time, you have 3 tracks and 2 switches. The trolley is headed towards 5 people, one switch sends it to 1 person, and the other switch would send it to 0 people, but it's broken. Voting third party is pulling the broken switch, knowing the 5 people will die but you've shifted the responsibility from yourself to whoever was supposed to fix the switch.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 minutes ago

I see you are upset the 3rd switch is broken. Me too, thanks.

Let us begin working on the switch together. I hope you swing by by my ask lemmy Post to discuss your post election commitment to replace FPTP voting in your state.

Who would leave such a critical piece of infrastructure unfixed? Most certainly not you I'm sure.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Excellent analogy. If anyone still plays dumb after reading this, they probably are

load more comments (57 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)