As the title says. It appears there's a regular reason being given for not voting Yes for the voice in parliament, as being "We don't know what we're voting for".
So, why don't the political leaders give a full, account of what people are voting for? Surely if they want to counter that argument, they can do it quickly and easily. Just give the details. Stop the argument in its tracks.
Another way to say it might be: Why do you think a full, transparent definition of what the voice will mean, has not been presented?
Now, as a side note. If this was posted in /r/Australia, it would be censored. This would be a waste of my time. Let's see if Lemmy can handle an adult conversation on this important topic.
The argument of 'lack of details' isn't made in good faith.
The details have been given, short form and in long, detailed documentation all readily available. The 'no' complaints are just excusatory.