this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
15 points (60.6% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1357 readers
42 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyatto@leminal.space -4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's wild that y'all get triggered by content warnings tbh. Not gonna say anything about the cw posted, but you never know what may be an actual trigger for someone and it doesn't really hurt to post content with one to be considerate. Maybe this poster knows someone who experiences a severe revulsion to images of processed meat products and they take care to be sensitive to that.

[–] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Ok but like its a fucking burger. You wouldn't put a warning on a picture of lentils

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Brussels sprouts, sure, but not lentils.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Definitely for spinach. Seeing spinach brings back unpleasant memories.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Spinach is inherently associated with Popeye, an old cartoon depicting toxic masculinity and abuse against women.

/s

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space -4 points 3 weeks ago

we may have to with people that get so upset over silly stuff like this lmao, do y'all actually see yourselves?

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

First, it's a burger.

Second, these people are tankies. They regularly celebrate massacres, genocides and terrorism, with many calls to enact more violence. They want to overthrow the system in a violent upheaval and kill everyone who disobeys.

The funny thing is that they need trigger warnings for mundane things like meat. How will they revolt if they are so delicate and soft that meat triggers them?

Do you see the point now?

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I get it, but y'all are being weird. Why not focus your criticisms on their primary values instead of valid beliefs/displays of compassion and empathy like this. Your values and communication style is just as tribal and incendiary. Your faux armchair machismo comes off just as pathetically as theirs does.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You do not see the point--alright.

Go and look at some of the top posts this past month or so. We cover plenty of their primary values, such as celebrating massacres and genocides and actively calling for the death of innocents en masse. Nor are they empathic, no one who celebrates murder has empathy. This 'compassion' is purely virtue signalling and a sign of how pampered and high-class they are.

Why aren't you commenting about any of the above? It's rather odd.

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh idk, Maybe it's because the post is just making fun of content warnings and I'm someone that appreciates and uses them.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's not making fun of content warnings. It's making fun that these extremists need to use them. I even explained this in the first comment.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The OP should have included a content warning about content warnings!

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space 1 points 3 weeks ago

honestly that may have to be the solution lol

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The vegans in their community asked for this CW. It makes sense to me, I get repulsed by seeing meat knowing what was done to the animals to get the meat. It's like seeing a gory image, especially if you've seen what happens in a vegan documentary or something before. The people in this thread are being very weird, if I had to guess they lean conservative.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This community is very diverse with its users views. We have some conservatives, some communists, liberals, anarchists, etc.

Regardless, the point is going over your head. The people who regularly call for violence, post violent imagery, and celebrate violent people need content warnings.

Do you not see the joke in that?

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah a lot of bad faith arguing against me. They think it is okay to bash on reasonable beliefs/actions as long as they are committed by someone who has other, more extreme, beliefs. But it's not okay, attack the bad views, not the good ones. This lemmy instance is definitely filled with a lot of these weird types.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

A lot of bad-faith arguing? Only I'm arguing with you. How am I arguing in bad faith while explaining what this post means while also asking for your opinions?